The SIX Swiss has been the trade of selection for a lot of European ETF issuers itemizing in Switzerland, nevertheless, a challenger has been making its bid to entice issuers to vary exchanges for the area with its cheaper charges and various consumer viewers.
BX Swiss, a Zurich-based subsidiary of Boerse Stuttgart, has been itemizing ETFs for roughly two years and has managed to draw BlackRock, DWS, Lyxor and Tabula Funding Administration to checklist merchandise on its trade.
In complete, BX Swiss has 213 ETFs listed together with varied foreign money hedges and asset courses. BlackRock has 83 ETFs on the trade in addition to DWS and Tabula having listed 54 and 6 ETFs, respectively.
In December 2019, Lyxor delisted 30 ETFs from the SIX Swiss and instantly listed with BX Swiss to have a complete of 70 merchandise out there on the trade, in keeping with knowledge from Ultumus.
One important distinction between the 2 Swiss exchanges is the itemizing and administration charges for ETF issuers.
Kind of charges | BX Swiss (CHF) | SIX Swiss (CHF) |
Admission of recent issuer (one-off) | eight,000 | 10,000 |
New itemizing of collective funding scheme (CIS) | Three,000 | 2,000-Three,000 |
Yearly payment cap for brand spanking new itemizing per issuer | 20,000 | No cap |
Annual upkeep charges (per CIS) | ||
1-10 Devices | 1,500 | Three,000 |
11-20 Devices | 1,000 | 1,500 |
21-25 Devices | 500 | 1,000 |
>25 Devices | 300 | 500 |
Supply: BX Swiss Change
BX Swiss matches or underprices SIX Swiss throughout the board relating to itemizing ETFs on its trade. Notably, new issuers seeking to checklist with the trade will pay CHF2,000 lower than itemizing with SIX Swiss. Moreover, relying on what number of devices the issuer has listed with the trade, a agency will save between CHF200 and CHF1,500 per product every year on upkeep charges.
To influence issuers to checklist or switch a number of merchandise at a time, BX Swiss provides a yearly payment cap of CHF20,000. This implies ETF issuers won’t incur any additional itemizing costs past their seventh product over the course of 12 months.
The upkeep charges additionally embody BX Swiss managing the market making, in keeping with Matthias Mueller, monetary markets operation at BX Swiss.
Chatting with ETF Stream, Mueller says BX Swiss selected a single market maker as a result of it fits the agency’s enterprise mannequin of preserving charges low in addition to it not being a excessive frequency inventory trade.
“We’re extra retail and impartial asset supervisor targeted whereas SIX Swiss targets the extra institutional shoppers,” Mueller stated.
Previous to becoming a member of BX Swiss, Mueller held quite a few positions for the SIX Group and SIX Swiss Change over the course of practically 9 years. These positions included product administration, senior gross sales supervisor and group innovation administration.
For the ETF issuers, all the things is about cost-benefit and “itemizing and market making ETFs are an enormous value base”, in keeping with Michael John Lytle, CEO at Tabula IM.
Lytle feedback on Switzerland being probably the most necessary markets for ETF issuers to checklist merchandise together with the UK, Germany and Italy.
However earlier than with the ability to present accessibility to ETFs for Swiss traders, there are a variety of hurdles an issuer should sort out.
“To be able to attain many Swiss traders, an issuer must register with FINMA, the native regulator, however the one manner to do that is thru making use of to checklist on an trade,” Lytle stated.
Along with buying and selling on trade, traders have entry to ETFs by way of over-the-counter (OTC) buying and selling.
Lytle says OTC buying and selling is rising its share of buying and selling volumes as platforms like TradeWeb are regional somewhat than nationwide.
“Many traders commerce on trade however this looks like extra of an operational profit somewhat than requiring deep swimming pools of liquidity.”
Tabula IM’s preliminary push to BX Swiss over SIX Swiss was attributed to a requirement for ETF issuers to checklist all share courses of a fund in Switzerland. Lytle stated this was a big monetary burden nevertheless this requirement has since modified.
Whereas it’s considerably cheaper for issuers to checklist with BX Swiss, the buying and selling volumes on the trade pale compared to these on SIX Swiss as a result of its institutional consumer focus. Buying and selling volumes are necessary as a result of they will verify to traders how liquid a product is whereas larger volumes can result in tighter bid-ask spreads.
What’s driving ETF adoption amongst European IFAs?
In Q1 2020, SIX Swiss hosted 511,152 ETF transactions with the quantity turnover for a single ETF topping at over 1.6m. The trade noticed over a million trades in 2019 with a mean commerce measurement of CHF120,000 whereas BX Swiss has a mean of CHF20,000.
For BX Swiss, the trade has seen a rise in buying and selling quantity up to now few months on account of the coronavirus pandemic however doesn’t contemplate itself as a excessive frequency inventory trade.
Mueller stated: “We aren’t huge in turnover nevertheless, that isn’t a very powerful issue for ETF issuers to hitch BX Swiss. They’ve a technique in thoughts the place they’d select the costlier inventory trade for his or her flagship funds which give heavy buying and selling volumes and right here, they will have extra selective merchandise out there to a area at a less expensive value.”
FESE: Unprecedented occasions – exchanges are ready
The principle concern for institutional traders when contemplating an ETF in Switzerland is that it’s registered with FINMA, Lytle says. Institutional traders will commerce wherever there may be liquidity and wouldn’t be sure to the native trade. It’s the small establishments that may prioritise the ticket prices with the native exchanges providing decrease prices which is what retains them native.
Apparently, most issuers have picked both BX Swiss or SIX Swiss to checklist their merchandise, however cryptocurrency ETP supplier 21Shares has listed on each exchanges.
Hany Rashwan, founder and CEO of 21Shares, commented: “They usually have completely different buyer profiles or completely different geographic footprints, and we wish to be certain that traders can discover our merchandise wherever they appear.”
Rashwan praises each exchanges and plans to proceed having the agency’s ETPs listed on each for the foreseeable future.
Signal as much as ETF Stream’s weekly e mail right here